NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 2.21.25: Contracting Parties Beware! Your Prior Oral Agreements Could Be Extinguished by Later Merger Clauses

Contracting parties beware.  The Court of Appeals recently reaffirmed that parties to contracts, especially ones involving millions of dollars of investments, should closely read and understand their agreements, or they may suffer unintended consequences.  That was exactly the case here, where the parties entered an oral investment agreement that would have let the investor take …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 2.14.25: Does an Easement Holder Have a Nondelegable Duty to Keep the Property Over Which the Easement is Held in a Reasonably Safe Condition?

The Fourth Department recently tackled whether an easement holder can delegate to another the duty to keep the premises over which the easement is held in a reasonably safe condition.  That duty, the Court held, is nondelegable, even in the face of an express contract between the property owner and the easement holder delegating the …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 2.7.25: Are the Vote Dilution Protections of the New York Voting Rights Act Constitutional?

In the face of declining enforcement of the federal Voting Rights Act, New York has adopted its own voting protections designed to provide voters with additional protections beyond those offered at the federal level.  The Second Department recently decided two important issues under the New York Voting Rights Act, rejecting a facial challenge to the …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 1.31.25: Do New York Courts Need the Original Immigrant Visa to Grant Full Faith and Credit to a Foreign Adoption Order?

In 2008, New York enacted a law recognizing and giving full faith and credit to foreign adoptions. The Legislature determined that New York adoptive parents shouldn’t go through the formal adoption procedures abroad, receive a foreign order of adoption, and then come back to New York only to have to do the same thing all …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 1.24.25: Are Punitive Damages Available For Consumer Protection Claims under General Business Law § 349(h)?

The Court of Appeals recently clarified that when a plaintiff brings a consumer protection action for deceptive business acts in violation of General Business Law § 349(h), it is limited to recovering its actual damages and treble damages up to a cap of $1,000.  Punitive damages over and above the $1,000 treble damages cap cannot be …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 1.17.25: May NYC Apartment Owners be Held Vicarious Liable for the Discriminatory Acts of Their Real Estate Brokers?

The First Department this week explained that New York City apartment owners may be held vicariously liable, under the New York City Human Rights Law, for the discriminatory acts of their real estate brokers. A holding otherwise, the Court explained, would let apartment owners off the hook for anything other than their own infrequent direct …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 1.10.25: May a Single Incident of Excessive Corporal Punishment Support a Finding of Neglect?

Happy new year, from all of us here at the NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter!  The courts have been busy, with new issues and Appellate Division conflicts popping up over the holidays. Let’s take a look at the recent opinions and what else has been happening in New York’s appellate courts over the past week. Appellate Division, …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 12.20.24: When Does a Municipality’s Electronic Notification System for Road Defects Constitute Prior Written Notice for Tort Liability?

The Court of Appeals this week held that the City of Albany’s “SeeClickFix” electronic notice system, through which residents could point out road defects and the like, was sufficient prior written notice to raise a question of fact for trial, in a plaintiff’s personal injury suit.  Following the Court’s decision, the City almost immediately took …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 12.13.24: You Have Agreed to Arbitrate All of Your Claims Against Uber

When you need a ride and call an Uber, you are agreeing to arbitrate any disputes with Uber, including personal injury claims, that arise from your ride.  That’s what the Court of Appeals held this week, when it determined for the first time that a web-based clickwrap process for assent to Uber’s terms of use …

NYSBA CasePrepPlus Newsletter 12.6.24: What Must a Criminal Defendant Show to Present a Justification Defense to Murder?

The Court of Appeals recently took a look at harmless error analysis in a criminal defendant’s challenge to a guilty plea, what a criminal defendant must show to be entitled to charge the jury with a justification defense to murder, whether a constitutional right to assigned counsel exists in administrative proceedings, and interesting to me …